To our mentors.
I have a death certificate that lists the informant’s relationship to the deceased as “nephew”. In addition, the 1851 census lists the relationship between these two particular persons as “head of household” and “nephew”. Additional research indicates that the informant was actually a grandnephew of the “head of household”/deceased. My question is, was it common in the 1800’s to make no “generational” distinction between a grandnephew and a nephew?
BobG
Are they the same?.....
Moderator: Global Moderators
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:46 am
- Location: Massachusetts USA
Are they the same?.....
Researching Grigor/Roy/Symon in Morayshire & Banffshire. Mearns/Roy/Low in Insch & Auchterless, Aberdeenshire.
-
- Posts: 5057
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Re: Are they the same?
BobBobG wrote:To our mentors.
I have a death certificate that lists the informant’s relationship to the deceased as “nephew”. In addition, the 1851 census lists the relationship between these two particular persons as “head of household” and “nephew”. Additional research indicates that the informant was actually a grandnephew of the “head of household”/deceased. My question is, was it common in the 1800’s to make no “generational” distinction between a grandnephew and a nephew?
BobG
Not so much not making a distinction, just that use of terms such as nephew and others such as step-son, son-in-law, was much looser than in today's world; in general people weren't that bothered !!
Davie
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:46 am
- Location: Massachusetts USA