However, some considerable time ago, when I found Robert Stewart on the 1891 census listed as a hairdresser, I immediately discounted him as my rellie. True, this one WAS born in the East Indies, same as mine was, but his age would have given him a birthdate of c1862. Mine was born in Mauritius in 1859 (I got his overseas BC from GRO), parents James Stewart and Anne Ireland.
As my Robert was living with his older brother John in Glasgow in 1881 and was listed as an Oiler in a Jute works that year, I couldn't see the wildly different occupation as being my chap. Today, I tried searching for Robert on the 1891 census again, this time on Ancestry and the only one that matched was the same hairdresser.
OK, so this guy was married to an Elizabeth. Looked up the MC on SP and found Robert Stewart marrying Elizabeth Delaney in 1886 in Angus, but he gives his parents as William Stewart a Baker and Jane Gardiner??? Yet again his age would make his birth in 1862, but new wife Elizabeth was only 19 at the time, so perhaps a wee white lie to pacify her parents.
I find him again in 1901, still a hairdresser, using his 1891 infant daughter to search, but now his birthplace is given as India (a wee bit misunderstanding mibbee?).
He dies in 1948 and his unmarried daughter Mary Jane is the informant. Again, not the right parents, but I'm wondering if she got that information from his MC.
Every avenue I follow keeps taking me back to this hairdresser...
Opinions warmly welcomed.