Kirk Sessions
Moderators: Global Moderators, Pandabean
-
scooter
- Posts: 372
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:22 pm
- Location: Kent, England
-
Archiver
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:49 pm
- Location: Aberdeen
Think it depends on how long it will take to get the 20,000 documents they want online - there are only 4,000 at the moment.Scooter wrote:I saw that, which I guess, traditionally, means about two years after that date - or maybe not? Are you in 'the knowledge' David?![]()
Cheers,
Scott
If they can get that done by December 2009, then it theoretically shouldn't take much longer to roll out the access. The testing stage by the 'partners' is over, as far I am aware, and their comments are being worked on.
Once the site is up, it seems like it will be the place to go for documents outwith the ScotlandsPeople remit - valuation rolls, for example, are mentioned as being a part of the project.
The kirk session records will simply be the digital images of the original, there hasn't been any indexing done as this would be a huge job to take on but the fun is in reading through them to get to what you want. It's very easy to be distracted by entries in the kirk session records!
Work is the curse of the drinking classes
-
SarahND
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5647
- Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:47 am
- Location: France
I agree that the fun is in reading the whole picture, as long as it is not costing £1 for each page as you read...Archiver wrote:The kirk session records will simply be the digital images of the original, there hasn't been any indexing done as this would be a huge job to take on but the fun is in reading through them to get to what you want. It's very easy to be distracted by entries in the kirk session records!
Here's hoping
Sarah
-
Archiver
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:49 pm
- Location: Aberdeen
-
Anne H
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 2127
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 5:12 pm
- Location: Scotland
-
SarahND
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5647
- Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:47 am
- Location: France
-
Anne H
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 2127
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 5:12 pm
- Location: Scotland
oops! Looks like I should have read the earlier posts before responding, Sarah.
I didn't realize the records weren't filed by name. The only Kirk Session Records I've ever seen were very kindly given to me all nicely typed and in date order...silly me, I didn't think about how they might be found in the actual books.
Regards,
Anne H0.
I'd be more than happy to make them an index...I'm not sure how quickly they would get it since I know I would be engrossed in reading every word, so there could be a long delay.How about getting them for free if you promise to make them an index of the bit you got?![]()
Regards,
Anne H0.
-
mal
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 2:07 pm
- Location: Teesside, England
I was in the NAS on Friday and spent a fascinating 20 minutes reading through the Tannadice Kirk Session minutes from 1797 on the computer there. Over a 2 year period there must have been about 6 meetings of the kirk session trying to get David Creighton to admit that he had gone to bed with 2 female servants and had transgressed with one of them. The girls admitted it but he did not. I did not have time to read right to the end.
They were not indexed at all and I am not sure how effective the indexing would be as quite a few pages were taken up with this episode. There were also 2 or 3 illegitimate children during this period but little else.
Malcolm
They were not indexed at all and I am not sure how effective the indexing would be as quite a few pages were taken up with this episode. There were also 2 or 3 illegitimate children during this period but little else.
Malcolm
-
Montrose Budie
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 11:37 pm
The basic problems are how to index them, and how to charge.SarahND wrote:I agree that the fun is in reading the whole picture, as long as it is not costing £1 for each page as you read...Archiver wrote:The kirk session records will simply be the digital images of the original, there hasn't been any indexing done as this would be a huge job to take on but the fun is in reading through them to get to what you want. It's very easy to be distracted by entries in the kirk session records!Do you suppose, as it is not indexed and therefore it is impossible to know if there is any relevant information, that the price will be low to compensate?
Here's hoping
Sarah
A pilot project based on an index based on every name mentioned demonstrated that such an index was a massive task beyond the current resources of NAS.
The most likely form of index will be a geographic one, but the question thenis how to arrnage access...........
mb
-
Montrose Budie
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 11:37 pm
'Online' in this instance refers to NAS's own system, for access from outside NAS, but currently greatly restricted as regards these records. In terms of the NAS internal system all the KS records are viewable - with just the one caveat, - it's a while since I checked if all the KS records held elsewhere have been borrowed for digitisation.Archiver wrote:Think it depends on how long it will take to get the 20,000 documents they want online - there are only 4,000 at the moment.Scooter wrote:I saw that, which I guess, traditionally, means about two years after that date - or maybe not? Are you in 'the knowledge' David?![]()
Cheers,
Scott
If they can get that done by December 2009, then it theoretically shouldn't take much longer to roll out the access. The testing stage by the 'partners' is over, as far I am aware, and their comments are being worked on.
Once the site is up, it seems like it will be the place to go for documents outwith the ScotlandsPeople remit - valuation rolls, for example, are mentioned as being a part of the project.
The kirk session records will simply be the digital images of the original, there hasn't been any indexing done as this would be a huge job to take on but the fun is in reading through them to get to what you want. It's very easy to be distracted by entries in the kirk session records!
mb