Post
by Russell » Sun May 28, 2006 1:54 am
Hello Sarah
The whole Poor Relief thing in Scotland is tied up over the centuries with religion, politics, finance and government ineptitude.
When Scotland was Roman Catholic way back the church were the main recipients of rents (mostly in kind) and parishes were encouraged to look after their own parishioners in times of need. Which they appeared to do fairly well despite the larcenous behaviour of some clerics.
As the country was pushed toward Calvinism although the clerical authority was changing most of the money which previously went to the church was not redirectd towards the new faith (Since many of the Abbots and clergy were the lesser sons of influential nobles)
This meant that although parishes were nominally the same the minister now in place had no cleary defined income with which to support the poor and destitute
Disruptions by wars, Cromwellian invasion and sundry changes of Royalty happening meant that consideration of the poor took a back seat and only parishes where there was some compassion from the local Laird seemed to give succour to the needy.
Further disruption of funding came during the Seccession years when breakaway churches were formed which were themselves dependent on the generosity of their adherents. Although various Parliamentary Acts were passed to favour the poor, the mechanisms and cash to put them into practice were never put in place.
Firm Governmental control in the 1800's established systems and defined responsibility as lying with the Parochial Councils. Only then did formal recording begin nationally. Prior to that time Parish Council records may or may not contain details of relief payments made to paupers. Where church financial records have survived some list the names of recipients.
Paupers generally received only enough assistance to augment support that their family were able to give.
Only the aged, mentally or physically infirm were taken in to be given in-house care usually in Combination Poorhouses. Some of these had surprisingly small numbers of residents
Rural areas generally appeared to support their poor rather better than the urban parishes which were probably over whelmed by the influx from the country as the industrial revolution gathered pace.
How we treat our poor is a fascinating aspect in a nations development.
Russell
Working on: Oman, Brock, Miller/Millar, in Caithness.
Roan/Rowan, Hastings, Sharp, Lapraik in Ayr & Kirkcudbrightshire.
Johnston, Reside, Lyle all over the place !
McGilvray(spelt 26 different ways)
Watson, Morton, Anderson, Tawse, in Kilrenny