To follow on from this, here is the actual MI:-
Here lie the remains of JOHN GAULD sometime farmer in Westtown d. 22 July 1759 aged 47 leaving behind 3 children JOHN,HARY & JEAN GAULDS. Also BARBARA INGRAM his spouse d. 9 June 1822 in the advanced age of 89 years. Also their son JOHN d. 7 Dec 1841 in the 77? year of his age. And HARRY GAULD d. 27? Mar 1848 aged 29, also HARRY GAULD his father d. 24 July 1856? aged 77 & His wife MARGARET OGG d. 25 Aug 1861 aged 80.
I have a Jane Gauld married to a James Smith in 1797 in Tarland. Their names confirmed from their son's d.c.
I have long suspected that the Jean Gauld mentioned on the MI could be the Jean Gauld who married James Smith, the only clue I had was that James Smith and Jean Gauld's daughter, Helen Smith, was with a family of Gaulds in 1841 as a herd girl.
However, a number of people on Roots and elsewhere have the Jean mentioned on the headstone marrying an Isaac Grant in 1806.
Now there are 2 Jean Gaulds born in Tarland. One born in 1773, father John Gauld. One born in 1782, father George Gauld. Mother's names do not appear on these IGI records.
If the Roots info is to be believed i.e. The one born in 1773 married Isaac Grant in 1806, then the one born in 1782 must have married James Smith in 1797 at the age of 15! This made me more convinced that my Jean was the one mentioned on the headstone and that she did marry James Smith.
Unfortunately there are no statutory death records for the Jean born in 1773 or for James Smith,
but there is one for the Jean born in 1782!!
Her father is named as George Gauld and her mother as Mary Moir. The icing on the cake would have been her husband's name, Isaac. However it is an 1860 d.c. and just shows her name as Jane Grant, widow of a farmer.
So by eliminating one Jean Gauld and proving who she was, I feel very happy to claim the Jean on the headstone as
MINE Unless someone can shoot my logic down in flames
Reading between the lines, I think a number of people have the MI and have jumped to the conclusion that Jean married Isaac Grant and, lets face it, it would be a lot easier tracing him than James Smith
Best wishes
Jean